Summary:

The use of tests and assignments as a means of evaluating job applicants can be a contentious issue. While some individuals may find that formal tests accurately reflect their abilities, others may argue that they do not provide a complete picture. On the other hand, assignments can provide a more nuanced evaluation of an applicant's suitability for the role and the company culture.

Assignments can be structured in a way that helps to determine if an applicant would fit well into the company culture, and if they are capable of performing the tasks required for the position. This approach can give employers a more comprehensive understanding of the applicant's abilities, as the tasks assigned can mimic those they would be responsible for in the role.

In addition, assignments that include teamwork elements can provide insight into the applicant's ability to work effectively within a team structure. This can be especially relevant for roles that require collaboration and teamwork.

Ultimately, the use of tests and assignments as a means of evaluating job applicants will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the employer. Both approaches have their advantages and limitations, and it is important to consider these factors when making a decision on which method to use.

Watch the full Q&A here.